IMPLEMENTASI SURAT PEMBERITAHUAN PERKEMBANGAN HASIL PENYIDIKAN TERKAIT MEKANISME PENYIDIKAN TINDAK PIDANA DI INDONESIA (STUDI KASUS DI KEPOLISIAN RESOR KOTA PEKANBARU)

Abstract

A Notification In ensuring accountability and transparency of investigations or
investigations, investigators are required to provide SP2HP to the reporting party whether
requested or not periodically at least once a month. Today there are often cases that SP2HP,
which is an obligation of investigators, is not realized or not implemented properly in
accordance with the provisions stipulated in the Police Regulation of the Republic of
Indonesia Number 16 of 2010 which states that SP2HP is public information and is a right for
the reporter. The purpose of the research is to find out the implementation of the Investigation
Result Progress Notification Letter related to the criminal investigation mechanism in
Indonesia, as well as to find out the obstacles faced by the police in implementing the
Investigation Result Progress Notification Letter related to the investigation mechanism in
criminal acts at the Pekanbaru City Resort Police (Polresta).
This type of research is sociological legal research. This research is located at the
Pekanbaru City Resort Police (Polresta). The data sources used are primary data and
secondary data, data collection techniques in this study are observation, questionnaires,
interviews, and literature review, and can be concluded with deductive thinking methods.
From the results of the study, it can be concluded that, First, the regulation of the
submission of SP2HP to the reporter is regulated in the Regulation of the Chief of Police of
the Republic of Indonesia (Perkap) Number 14 of 2012 concerning Investigation Management
for the submission of SP2HP, the submission of SP2HP to the reporter at the Pekanbaru City
Police has not run optimally because there are several obstacles. Second, the reporter does
not provide a clear address to the investigator of the Criminal Investigation Unit of the
Pekanbaru City Police, the reporter is not in his place of existence, there are reporters who
only make reports but have no concern for the continuation of the case, the mobile phone
number or telephone provided by the reporter is not active or even does not have a
communication device, the public is less aware