TINJAUAN YURIDIS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI PEKANBARU NOMOR 109/PDT.SUS-PARPOL/2022/PNPBR TENTANG GUGATAN PELAKSANAAN MUSYAWARAH DAERAH DEWAN PIMPINAN DAERAH PARTAI DEMOKRAT PROVINSI RIAU

Abstract

The problem of internal conflicts of political parties that occur in the management of
the democratic party in Riau province. In 2021. This conflict is seen as a conflict over power
and leadership within the democratic party in Riau Province.In this conflict the agitators are
Asri Auzar and friends who are legitimate administrators of the Regional Leadership Council
(DPD). In his lawsuit, the plaintiff explained the beginning of problems that occurred in the
management of the Democratic Party.
This research is a researcher of normative law. This is based on literature research
that takes quotations from reading books, or supporting books that have something to do with
the problem to be studied. This study used Secondary data sources consisting of primary,
secondary, and tertiary book materials. This study also used qualitative data analysis and
produced Descriptive data.
From the results of the research and discussion conducted, there are several
conclusions obtained, namely: first, the case of political party settlement to the district court
is Article 33 paragraph (1) of Law Number 2 of 2011 which reads, "In the event that dispute
resolution as referred to in Article 32 is not achieved, dispute resolution is carried out through
the District Court". Settlement of political party disputes through district courts is an effort if
settlement through the mechanism of political party courts cannot be achieved.
Second, as well as the dismissal and implementation of regional deliberations only one
day apart violates the principle of propriety and the party does not carry out its functions as
regulated by Law Number 2 of 2011 concerning Amendments to Law Number 2 of 2008
concerning Political Parties, the authority in carrying out regional deliberations is the DPD,
not the DPP nor the 12 DPCs of the Democratic Party, the DPP is only authorized to carry
out extraordinary deliberations.
The author's suggestion is that there should be strengthening of the Regional
Leadership Council of Political Parties in matters of regional deliberations without being able
to intervene in the Central Leadership Council of Political Parties as well as legal
arrangements for the settlement of political party disputes in Law Number 2 of 2011
concerning Amendments to Law Number 2 of 2008 concerning Political Parties.
Keywords : Internal conflicts, Internal conflicts, Political Party Court