PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN NEGARA PENGIRIM ATAS PENYALAHGUNAAN HAK KEKEBALAN DAN KEISTIMEWAAN OLEH PEJABAT DIPLOMATIK (STUDI KASUS PERBUDAKAN MODERN TERHADAP IMIGRAN FILIPINA OLEH PEJABAT DIPLOMATIK ARAB SAUDI DI INGGRIS)

Abstract

Immunities and privileges of change offices aim to support performance and to avoid
intervention from parties. Being unable to be arrested and immune from the power of law,
whether criminal, civil law, or administrative law, is a form of impunity for destruction. In
this thesis the case of protecting the rights of protection that occurred in England involved
the replacement of a Saudi Arabian gun named Khalid Basfar. The official who overlaid it
had protected his right of immunity for exploiting his right to licence and traffic in human
beings to his domestic worker named Josephine Wong. The domestic worker from the
Philippines also did not receive her wages while working at Basfar's residence. Freedom to
protect protections like this makes it necessary for the sending country to take legal
responsibility for the reduction.
The research method used in this research is normative legal research. This research
is library law research. The focus of the discussion of this research is related to legal
principles. The data sources used are primary, secondary and tertiary legal sources. In this
legal research, researchers use a case approach which will examine the 1961 Vienna
Convention on Diplomatic Relations, the 1961 Vienna Optional Protocol, to the 2000
Palermo Protocol on Trafficking in Persons.
The result obtained is that there is an urgency for the responsibility of the sending
country in responding to the issue of securing immunity which can create better relations
between the receiving country and the sending country and the victim country. The forms that
are expressed in simple terms are the responsibility of the sending country, both in the form
of recalling and removing the immunity from restrictions. This research also describes the
legal remedies that can be taken by the receiving country and the victim country.
Keywords: Diplomatic Immunity, Slavery, State Accountability