Penerapan Putusan Serta Merta (Uit Voerbaar Bij Voorraad) Terhadap Perkara Perdata Pada Pengadilan Negeri Pekanbaru Kelas I A.

Abstract

The judge's decision aims to resolve a dispute, the litigants have the option to submit an
application for an immediate decision (Uitvoerbaar Bij Voorraadd) and efforts to make it
happen are regulated in Article 180 paragraph (1) HIR/Article 191 paragraph (1) Rbg,
even though the Pekanbaru District Court Class I A often accepts requests for judgments
immediately (Uitvoerbaar Bij Voorraadd), but very rarely grants them. Immediate
application of decisions (uit voerbaar bij voorraad) in civil cases in Register Number:
26/Pdt.G/2012/PN.PBR and civil cases register number: 116/Pdt.G/2013/PN.PBR at the
Pekanbaru District Court Class 1A.
This type of research can be classified into the type of sociological research, with the
research location taking place at the Pekanbaru District Court Class IA, while the
population and sample are all parties related to the problem under study. This study uses
data sources in the form of primary data and secondary data, and data collection
techniques are carried out by interviews.
From the results of the study, there are two main things that can be concluded, firstly the
application of an immediate decision (Uitvoerbaar Bij Voorraad) at the Pekanbaru
District Court has clearly been effective and relevant to be guided by developments in the
world of justice, because before deciding an immediate decision, every condition has been
fulfilled in accordance provisions of the Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 3 of 2000
Concerning Immediate Decisions (Uitvoerbaar Bij Voorraad) and Provisional and
Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 4 of 2001 concerning Issues of Immediate
Decisions (Uitvoerbaar Bij Voorraad) and Provisionil. Decisions can immediately
become guidelines for judges to settle cases that cannot be executed because they do not
include a commendator's order in their decision. Second, the obstacle to the granting of
an immediate decision (Uitvoerbaar Bij Voorraad) according to the material
requirements lies in the discrepancy between the case and the facts of the trial, because
many cases that ask for an immediate decision (Uitvoerbaar Bij Voorraad) tend not to
meet the requirements set by SEMA, because most cases are in court Pekanbaru State, did
not prepare the conditions needed to grant the decision immediately (Uitvoerbaar Bij
Voorraad). Formal obstacles when one of the seven requirements is met, the judge is
instructed not to decide the case immediately, but first to consult the chairman of the high
court and the chairman of the district court, although this procedure tends to limit the
independence of judges, this is in accordance with the principle of prudence always
emphasized by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia in handling cases for
which an immediate decision is requested (Uitvoerbaar Bij Voorraad).
Keyword : Dispute, Civil Case, Implementation of Immidiate Verdict.