KEPATUHAN PEJABAT NEGARA DALAM PELAKSANAAN PUTUSAN PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA (PTUN) DALAM PERSPEKTIF GOOD GOVERNANCE (studi kasus : kepatuhan pejabat negara dalam pelaksanaan putusan PTUN Pekanbaru)

Abstract

Law is the basic point for achieving justice and prosperity for all people in
Indonesia. The applicable law is designed in such a way as to regulate all
behavior and public relations. The State Administrative Court was formed
through legal reform with the aim of maintaining good relations between the
community and the government. With the presence of the State Administrative
Court, it is hoped that any disputes between the public and the government, which
in this case is a state official with authority, can be resolved properly. However,
in some cases there are decisions of State Administrative Courts that have not
been implemented by the losing party (in this case, the state official). This
decision that was not implemented even occurred at the Pekanbaru District
Administrative Court. The level of compliance of state officials with decisions
issued by the court is a measure of the extent to which the court is able to
maintain good relations between the community and the government.
This type of research can be classified as a type of sociological legal
research that is sociological juridical, which examines compliance issues that are
influenced by applicable law, especially the compliance of state officials in
carrying out the formal decisions of the Pekanbaru State Administrative Court in
relation to the theory of the Pancasila state law and the theory of legal
compliance. Sources of data used are primary data and secondary data consisting
of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials.
The data collection techniques in this study were the methods of observation,
interviews and literature review. After the data was collected, it was analyzed to
draw conclusions. From the results of this study, there are three main points that
can be concluded. First, the level of compliance of state officials is still not good.
Second, the compliance and non-compliance factors where there are still some
state officials who do not comply with the evidence that the Pekanbaru
administrative court inkraht decision is not implemented.
Keywords: State Officials Compliance - Administrative Court Decision - Good
Governance