PENYELESAIAN PERKARA DALAM PELANGGARAN PASAL 312 UNDANGUNDANG NOMOR 22 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG LALU LINTAS DAN ANGKUTAN JALAN DI WILAYAH HUKUM KEPOLISIAN RESOR KOTA PEKANBARU

Abstract

Hit and run case in traffic is a criminal offense that can lead to anxiety and raises
concerns that quite disturbing and cause harm to the victims and the people who do not know
or have been victims of hit and run that agency is not responsible. The handling of a criminal
offense must be treated seriously by the police in order to resolve this infringement case.
Therefore, the authors are interested in conducting research under the title Against Criminal
Liability Violation of Article 312 of Law Number 22 Year 2009 regarding Traffic and Road
Transportation Law Regional Police in the city of Pekanbaru. Then to find out the barriers
and drawbacks encountered in the implementation of criminal liability for violation of Article
312 of Law Number 22 of 2009 on Traffic and Road Transportation Law On Territory
Pekanbaru City Police. The last to know the efforts to overcome the obstacles and
weaknesses of the implementation of criminal liability for violation of Article 312 of Law
Number 22 of 2009 on Traffic and Road Transportation Law On Territory Pekanbaru City
Police.
In writing this essay, the author uses empirical approach or sociological law research.
Regional research sites in Pekanbaru City Police Law. Data sources supported by the
primary data source, secondary. While data collection techniques are interviews and review
of data using deductive method is to analyze the problems of a general nature then drawn to
a conclusion in particular based on existing theories.
From the results of research and discussion the authors to conclude that the First, the
implementation of criminal liability for violation of Article 312 Law on Traffic and Road
Transport are accountable for the basic errors which are intentional, but did not rule out
because of an omission; Second, barriers experienced in the implementation of criminal
liability for violation of Article 312 of Law Traffic and Road Transport Police Jurisdiction In
Pekanbaru City area that is a factor, the evidence is not numbered Police, facilities and
inadequate infrastructure, lack of personnel, calling witnesses constraints, high cost in the
process of investigation and inquiry; Third, the efforts made to overcome the obstacles and
weaknesses in the implementation of criminal liability for violation of Article 312 of Law
Traffic and Road Transport Jurisdiction In Pekanbaru City Police are making efforts to
alleviate the criminal sanctions peaceful perpetrators of hit and run, mengomptimalkan
number of personnel, conduct coordination with the SAMSAT Pekanbaru, make socialization
and education to the community, make Emergeny Call, perform intensive treatment in
accident-prone areas, to give understanding to people who are witnesses to come to address
the witness was.
Keywords: Criminal Liability, Breach, Hit and Run