IMPLEMENTASI PERATURAN KEJAKSAAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 10 TAHUN 2019 TENTANG PERUBAHAN ATAS PERATURAN JAKSA AGUNG NOMOR PER-002/A/JA/05/2017 TENTANG PELELANGAN DAN PENJUALAN LANGSUNG BENDA SITAAN ATAU BARANG RAMPASAN NEGARA ATAU BARANG SITA EKSEKUSI DI KEJAKSAAN NEGERI KUANTAN SINGINGI

Miftah Nurjannah, Dessy Artina, Muhammad A. Rauf

Abstract


The Prosecutor’s execution auction come from found items and looted items
related to evidence in criminal cases. The Prosecutor’s office is executor of court
decisions that have been determined for evidence that has been decided to be returned,
confifcated for destruction, confiscated for the state or auctioned.
The type of research used is sociologicalresearch, using primary data obtained
directly at the research location throughdirect interviews with related parties and
ssecondary data obtained by means of library research in the form of books, scientific
works, related documents and internet sites related to the research this. The porposeof this
research is to determine the imp;ementation of the evidence auction at the Kuantan
Singingi District Prosecutor’s Office based on Prosecutor’s Regulation Number 10 of
2019 and then obstacles to the implementation of the Prosecutor’s Office evidence
auction.
Based on the research results, it is clear that the auction process for the execution
of confiscated goods carried out by the Kuantan Singingi District Prosecutor’s Office
shows that there are still obstacle in its implementation. Coordination between various
government agencies requires time because determining the limit price for goods to be
auctioned cannotbe determined directly without a physical inspection of the goods. The
low interest of auction participants also influences the implementation of the auction
because the large number of auction participants determines whether or not the items to
be auctioned will sell.
Keywords: Prsecutor’s Office, Auction, Evidence.


Full Text:

PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.