PELAKSANAAN PERATURAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 4 TAHUN 2019 TENTANG PERUBAHAN ATAS PERATURAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 2 TAHUN 2015 TENTANG TATA CARA PENYELESAIAN GUGATAN SEDERHANA DI PENGADILAN NEGERI PEKANBARU

Abstract

Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 2019 the change of Supreme Court Regulation Number 2
2015 about Small Claim Court Implementation Procedure regulate about small claim court mechanism
from the case received by court until the call for the defendant to implement the decision or called by
aanmaning, in the case number 37/pdt.g.s/2021/PN.Pbr and 27/pdt.g.s/2023/PN.Pbr there few things
that couldn’t applicated according to the regulation, there is the maximal time to finish the lawsuit and
the maximal time to determine aanmaning, the purpose of this research is to know how the
implementation and the obstacle of Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 2019 the change of Supreme
Court Regulation Number 2 2015 about Small Claim Court implementation procedure in Pekanbaru
District court.
Type of research used is empirical research and is supported by literature studies, the author
directly conducted research on the location to provide a clear picture of the problem being studied. This
research was conducted at the Pekanbaru District Court, the sample population in this study was Mr.
Jon Kenedi as representative of the plaintiff's attorney, Mr. Boyke Amri as representative of the
defendant's attorney, Mr. Salomo Ginting and Mr. Sugeng Harsoyo as Judge of the Pekanbaru District
Court, Mr. Sutanto as Registrar of the Pekanbaru District Court, data sources used, primary data and
secondary data, data collection techniques in this research using interviews, literature review and data
analysis
The results of research on problems regarding the implementation of Supreme Court Regulation
4 of 2019 can be concluded that the implementation of Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 of 2019 at
the Pekanbaru District Court has actually reduce the accumulatiion case, there are several provisions
that have not been implemented in accordance with the Supreme Court Regulation which is caused by a
number of internal inhibiting factors. namely limited time and external, namely the absence of the parties
at the first hearing. Therefore the judges as the implement of the regulation need to know what is the
obstacle of the implementation Supreme Court Regulation in Pekanbaru District Court to solve the
unsuitable application of Supreme Court Regulation, and the party who involved in the determine of
aanmaning should pay attention to more details regarding the timing of the aanmaning determination
and the purpose formed of Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 2019 The Change of Supreme Court
Regulation Number 2 2015 about Small Claim Court Implementation Procedure can be achieved.

Keywords: Small Claim Court-Supreme Court Regulation-Implementation.