ANALISIS YURIDIS PENGGABUNGAN PEMIDANAAN TINDAK PIDANA LINGKUNGAN HIDUP DAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG BERDASARKAN STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR : 71 /Pid.sus/LH/2018/PN.PLW DAN PUTUSAN NOMOR : 38/Pid.sus/LH/2018/PN.Pbr

Abstract

The convict M. Ali Honopiah received two court decisions that occurred in
the case in Decision Number: 71/Pid.Sus/Lh/2018/Pn Plw and Decision Number:
38/Pid.Sus-TPK/2018/PN.Pbr ., So that the convict commits several criminal acts at
once, namely the Commerce and Transport of Protected Animals and the Crime of
Money Laundering. From the two decisions above, that the convict committed several
criminal acts at different times so that the two decisions were not in accordance with
Article 65 of the Criminal Code.
The purpose of writing this thesis, namely: First, to find out the juridical
perspective on the merger of Environmental Crimes and Money Laundering, the
Study of Decision Number 71/Pid.Sus/Lh/2018/Pn Plw and Decision Number
38/Pid.sus/LH/ 2018/Pn.Pb. Second, to find out the application of the merger of
Environmental Crimes and Money Laundering, the Study of Decision Number
71/Pid.Sus/Lh/2018/Pn Plw and Decision Number 38/Pid.sus/LH/2018/Pn.pbr.
This type of research can be classified into normative research. The data
sources used are primary data and secondary data
From the results of the study that in the decision on environmental crimes and
money laundering crimes committed by M Ali Honopiah. In this case, the Public
Prosecutor (JPU) stated that M. ALI HONOPIAH has been legally proven and guilty
of committing the crime of money laundering. because the elements of a criminal
offense in the Primary indictment have been fulfilled in themselves and the actions of
the Defendant. So that the decision has not used Article 65 regarding the merging of
punishments

Keywords: COMMERCIAL CRIMINAL ACTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CRIMINAL
ACTS OF MONEY LAUNDERING